The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytocompatibility of various cell delivery
devices using a battery of tests under exaggerated conditions. These tests were carried
out using a human embryonic cell line transfected with Toll-like receptors (TLR) and
a human monocytic cell line. The TLR-transfected cell line was used to evaluate the
potential for cell surface receptor modulation and consequent changes in downstream
signaling pathways that could occur when passing cells through a device. TLRs are
well characterized and respond to a range of relevant ligands; for these reasons,
TLRs were used as representative receptors to indicate modulation of cell surface
receptors. The human monocytic cell line was used to characterize the viability and
metabolic activity of cells following incubation with media exposed to the test article
for a set time. This assay evaluated the potential toxicity of substances that might
be released from the medical device on the cellular product being delivered. Human
monocytes were selected for use because they are well-characterized in the literature
and familiar to academic and industrial labs. For each assay, all devices were incubated
with complete cell culture media for a period of time far exceeding that expected
for clinical use. Assays were performed after a set exposure period to the delivery
device exposed media. Taken together, data generated from these tests may be representative
of alterations that could arise in therapeutic cells when processed through medical
devices and provide a basis for cytocompatibility evaluation of delivery devices.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to CytotherapyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Publication history
158
Identification
Copyright
© 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.